Technology is reshaping how Nebraska farms operate, driving efficiency, sustainability, and better decision‑making across both crop and livestock operations. Precision agriculture tools such as GPS‑guided equipment, yield monitors and maps, soil grid sampling, and variable‑rate application systems let producers tailor inputs like seed, fertilizer, and water to specific field conditions rather than treating an entire field uniformly — which can save money, optimize yields, and reduce environmental impact. Nebraska farmers also use drones, sensors, and remote monitoring tools to track crop health and soil moisture in real time, giving insights that weren’t possible even a decade ago.
Despite recent surveys showing a modest decline in some precision ag adoption rates, digital tools and connectivity remain widespread: smartphones and internet access are near ubiquitous on Nebraska farms, and cloud‑based platforms and data systems support everything from irrigation management to equipment telematics. As these technologies generate more data, clear agreements between landowners and tenants about data sharing, technology investments, and responsibilities for equipment and software can help ensure both parties benefit — especially when calculating inputs, adjusting leases, or evaluating performance. By embracing technology thoughtfully, Nebraska farms can improve productivity, enhance sustainability, and position themselves for long‑term success in an increasingly data‑driven agricultural economy.
Participating in USDA conservation programs can provide Nebraska landowners with steady income and environmental benefits while enhancing the long‑term productivity and sustainability of their land. Programs like the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) pay annual rental payments for enrolling environmentally sensitive cropland or grassland in long‑term vegetative covers — typically 10 to 15‑year contracts — which help control erosion, improve water quality, and create wildlife habitat. These voluntary payments offer a reliable income stream on acreage that may be marginal for crop production, while CRP practices like grass waterways or riparian buffers can also protect soil and water resources long term.
Other USDA incentives such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) provide financial and technical assistance to implement conservation practices on working farmland and ranchland. These might include cover crops, nutrient management, fencing, prescribed grazing plans, or water quality improvements, and can increase soil health and drought resilience while reducing input costs.
Conservation enrollment can influence lease terms and land valuation. For leased land, agreements should clearly address program participation, reporting responsibilities, and any restrictions on farming activities during the contract term. From a valuation perspective, conserved acres under long‑term CRP or easements may have lower current agricultural rental income but can command higher per‑acre value for buyers who appreciate habitat, water quality benefits, or incentives tied to conservation. Overall, these programs help protect natural resources and can make farmland more attractive to tenants and investors focused on sustainability.
Farmland often represents a multi‑generation legacy — both financially and emotionally — which makes proactive estate planning essential for Nebraska landowners who want to preserve their acreage and ensure smooth transitions to the next generation. Without a thoughtful plan, assets can be tied up in probate, creating delays, increased costs, and potential conflict among heirs. Tools such as wills, trusts (including revocable living trusts), family LLCs or farm trusts, and gifting strategies help define who inherits the land, how it’s divided, and how taxes are minimized, preserving both value and family harmony. Working with attorneys and tax professionals experienced in agricultural estate planning ensures your wishes are clearly documented and legally enforceable.
For Nebraska specifically, estate planning also involves understanding tax implications. While the state does not impose a traditional estate tax, it does have an inheritance tax based on the heir’s relationship to the decedent, and farmland values can be high enough that even small percentage taxes create cash flow challenges for heirs who inherit property. Another key consideration is the stepped‑up basis rule, which can significantly reduce capital gains taxes when land is passed at death by resetting the property’s tax basis to its fair market value at that time, helping heirs avoid large taxable gains if they choose to sell.
Because every family’s situation and goals are different — including who will farm the land, how income and responsibility will be shared, and how to equitably treat non‑farming heirs — engaging a comprehensive estate planning team early on is critical. These professionals can help you tailor strategies that protect your legacy, minimize tax burdens, and provide clarity and peace of mind for future generations.
In competitive agricultural land markets, timing can make all the difference. A Reverse 1031 Exchange gives investors a strategic advantage by allowing them to acquire replacement property before selling their existing real estate while still deferring capital gains taxes under IRS Section 1031 rules. This approach can be especially valuable when high-quality farmland becomes available in regions such as Nebraska or Kansas, where desirable acreage may not stay on the market long. Rather than risk losing a prime property while waiting to sell another tract, investors can move quickly to secure the new land and complete the exchange afterward.
How a Reverse 1031 Exchange Works
A Reverse 1031 Exchange essentially flips the order of a traditional 1031 exchange. In a standard exchange, a property owner sells the relinquished property first and then purchases a replacement property within the required IRS timeline. In a reverse exchange, the replacement property is acquired first.
This “buy first, sell later” strategy can provide flexibility in fast-moving land markets where opportunities arise unexpectedly. For farmers, ranchers, and agricultural investors throughout the Midwest — including Nebraska and Kansas — this flexibility can make it possible to secure productive farmland, expand an operation, or reposition an investment portfolio without losing valuable tax-deferral benefits.
A 1031 exchange allows business or investment real estate to be exchanged for like-kind property while deferring capital gains taxes under IRS Section 1031 like-kind exchange rules. Agricultural land, pasture ground, and other farm or ranch properties typically qualify as like-kind real estate, which means they can often be exchanged for other agricultural properties across state lines. For example, a landowner might sell farmland in Kansas and reinvest the proceeds into irrigated ground in Nebraska, or vice versa, while still maintaining the tax-deferred treatment provided by Section 1031.
The Role of the Exchange Accommodation Titleholder (EAT)
Because IRS rules prohibit an investor from holding title to both the relinquished and replacement properties simultaneously during the exchange process, a third-party entity known as an Exchange Accommodation Titleholder (EAT) is used to temporarily hold title to one of the properties.
This arrangement is often referred to as “parking” the property. Depending on how the transaction is structured, the EAT may hold the replacement property until the relinquished property sells, or it may hold the relinquished property until the exchange is completed. This structure allows the Reverse 1031 Exchange to comply with IRS requirements while still giving the investor time to sell their original property.
Reverse 1031 Exchange Timeline and IRS Deadlines
Once the replacement property has been acquired in a Reverse 1031 Exchange, strict IRS timelines still apply. The taxpayer must identify the property they intend to sell within 45 days of acquiring the replacement property. After identification, the relinquished property must be sold within 180 days of the initial acquisition.
Meeting these deadlines is critical to maintaining the tax-deferred status of the transaction. Failing to meet the requirements can result in the exchange being disqualified and the capital gains becoming immediately taxable.
Why Reverse 1031 Exchanges Are More Complex
While a Reverse 1031 Exchange can provide valuable flexibility, it is generally more complex than a traditional exchange. These transactions often require upfront financing since the replacement property must typically be purchased before the relinquished property sells.
In addition, the transaction structure must comply with detailed IRS regulations governing reverse exchanges. This complexity means careful planning and coordination are essential, particularly when dealing with agricultural real estate transactions involving large tracts of farmland in Nebraska, Kansas, and across the Midwest.
Working With Experienced Reverse 1031 Exchange Professionals
Working with experienced professionals is key to successfully completing a Reverse 1031 Exchange. A qualified 1031 exchange intermediary helps structure the transaction and ensures that funds are handled according to IRS rules. In addition, tax advisors and real estate professionals familiar with agricultural property exchanges can help investors determine whether this strategy is the right fit.
Because farmland markets can vary significantly from region to region, local expertise can also play an important role in identifying opportunities and navigating the transaction process.
When properly structured, a Reverse 1031 Exchange allows investors to move decisively in competitive markets, secure high-quality land, and maintain the tax advantages provided by Section 1031. For agricultural investors looking to acquire farmland in Nebraska, Kansas, or throughout the Midwest, this strategy can provide the flexibility needed to act quickly without sacrificing long-term tax planning goals.
Taxpayers must report each like-kind exchange to the IRS using Form 8824, which calculates deferred gain and documents the details of the transaction. Because of the reporting requirements and transaction complexity, professional guidance is strongly recommended. See IRS Form 8824 instructions.
To find out more about Reverse 1031 Exchanges, call 866-995-8067, emailus, or fill out our convenient web form to speak with an experienced land professional.
Using a 1031 like-kind exchange with Nebraska farmland lets investors defer federal and state capital gains taxes when they sell an investment property (like crop ground, ranchland, or pasture) and reinvest the proceeds into another like-kind real estate investment. Under IRS Section 1031, as long as both the relinquished and replacement properties are held for investment or business use, the gain on the sale can be rolled into the new property without recognizing taxable income at the time of the transaction. This strategy helps preserve wealth, keep more capital working for you, and grow or reposition your agricultural real estate portfolio over time.
To complete a 1031 exchange successfully, there are strict IRS timelines and rules you must follow: after selling your Nebraska farmland, you have 45 calendar days to identify potential replacement properties in writing and 180 calendar days from the sale to close on the new property. All sale proceeds must be handled through a Qualified Intermediary (QI) — you cannot take possession of the cash yourself — or the exchange could be disqualified. The replacement property must be of equal or greater value and you must reinvest all net proceeds to defer all of the gain; any cash taken out (called boot) becomes taxable.
Because of these timing requirements and technical rules (including identification options like the “3-property rule,” “200 % rule,” or “95 % rule”), planning well in advance with a qualified intermediary, tax advisor, and farmland expert familiar with Nebraska 1031 exchanges is essential. With careful coordination, a 1031 exchange can be a powerful tool for landowners looking to defer tax, reposition their holdings, or transition into different types of real estate without immediate capital gains consequences.
Using a Self-Directed IRA (SDIRA) to invest in farmland can be a powerful way to diversify retirement savings into real, tangible agricultural assets while enjoying tax-advantaged growth. Unlike standard IRAs that limit you to stocks and bonds, SDIRAs allow you to purchase real estate — including raw land or farmland — as long as the investment is held solely for retirement purposes and all income and expenses flow directly through the IRA. This means rental income from the land goes back into the account, and any appreciation in value grows tax-deferred in a Traditional SDIRA or tax-free in a Roth SDIRA.
However, the IRS imposes strict rules and prohibited transaction safeguards on SDIRA real estate investments. You cannot use or personally benefit from the land, hire yourself or family members to work on it, or sell property you already own into your IRA — all of these actions are considered self-dealing and can disqualify the IRA, triggering taxes and penalties. Additionally, all expenses (like taxes, maintenance, and repairs) must be paid from the IRA, and all income must return to it. Because of these complexities and the potential for heavy penalties if rules are broken, investors should work with a qualified custodian and tax professional familiar with SDIRA farmland transactions to ensure compliance and maximize the long-term benefits of this strategy.
Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) have become an increasingly popular tool for real estate investors looking for tax efficiency, passive income opportunities, and portfolio diversification. For farmland owners and agricultural real estate investors, DSTs can offer a unique way to stay invested in land while stepping away from the day-to-day responsibilities of ownership and management.
A Delaware Statutory Trust is a legal entity created under Delaware law that allows multiple investors to pool capital and own fractional beneficial interests in real estate held by the trust. Rather than purchasing and managing an entire property independently, investors own a proportional share of a professionally managed real estate asset or portfolio.
One of the primary reasons DSTs have gained attention is their treatment under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Internal Revenue Service recognizes qualifying DST interests as like-kind replacement property for 1031 exchanges. This allows investors who sell appreciated real estate—including farmland—to defer capital gains taxes by reinvesting sale proceeds into DST interests rather than purchasing another property outright.
For many farmland owners, this creates a compelling option during ownership transitions. A landowner selling highly appreciated farmland may face significant capital gains exposure. Traditionally, avoiding those taxes through a 1031 exchange required identifying and acquiring another qualifying property within strict IRS deadlines. That process can be stressful, especially in competitive land markets where desirable replacement properties may be limited.
DSTs can simplify that process. Because investors purchase fractional interests in already-acquired institutional-grade properties, they often provide access to replacement options that are easier to identify within the exchange timeline. This can reduce the pressure of finding and closing on an entire replacement farm or ranch before deadlines expire.
For farmland investors specifically, DSTs may offer access to larger and more diversified agricultural holdings than most individuals could purchase on their own. These portfolios may include row crop farmland, permanent crop operations, ranchland, or agricultural infrastructure spread across multiple geographic regions. Diversification across markets, crops, and operators can help reduce exposure to localized weather events, commodity volatility, or regional economic shifts.
Another major advantage is professional management. DST properties are typically operated by experienced asset managers who oversee leasing, tenant relationships, capital improvements, and operational decisions. For investors who no longer want the responsibilities of active landownership—or who live far from their investment properties—this passive structure can be highly appealing.
This can be particularly attractive for retiring farmers or absentee landowners. Rather than managing lease negotiations, maintenance issues, irrigation oversight, or tenant transitions, investors receive income distributions based on their ownership percentage while professional managers handle day-to-day operations.
Lower minimum investment thresholds also make DSTs accessible to a broader range of investors. Instead of needing several million dollars to acquire high-quality agricultural land directly, investors may be able to participate with substantially less capital, depending on the offering.
That said, DSTs are not without limitations.
One of the biggest tradeoffs is loss of control. Investors do not make operational or strategic decisions regarding the property. Decisions related to leasing, refinancing, improvements, or eventual sale are handled by the trust sponsor or asset manager. For farmland owners accustomed to direct oversight, this can feel restrictive.
Liquidity is another consideration. DST interests are generally illiquid and intended to be held for a set investment period, often five to ten years. Exiting early may be difficult or impossible without substantial discounts. Investors should be comfortable committing capital for the long term.
Transparency can also vary between sponsors. Because performance depends heavily on management quality, due diligence is critical. Investors should carefully evaluate the sponsor’s experience, fee structure, property underwriting, and track record before committing capital.
Recent trends in agricultural investing have increased interest in professionally managed farmland as investors seek inflation-resistant assets and long-term income potential. Farmland has historically been viewed as a stable real asset with low correlation to traditional stock and bond markets, making it attractive within diversified portfolios.
For Nebraska farmland owners considering a sale, a DST may offer a practical strategy for preserving tax deferral while maintaining agricultural real estate exposure. However, these structures are complex investments with legal, tax, and financial implications.
Before pursuing a DST—especially as part of a 1031 exchange—it is essential to consult qualified tax, legal, and financial advisors. Careful evaluation can help determine whether this passive investment vehicle aligns with your long-term financial goals, risk tolerance, and estate planning strategy.
Ready to take the next step?
AgWest Land Brokers can help you understand the results of a farmland assessment before you make a decision to purchase. or sell To see how we can help call 866-995-8067, send an email, or fill out our convenient web form.
Nebraska is one of the nation’s agricultural leaders, and much of that success begins beneath the surface. The state’s diverse soils play a major role in determining which crops perform best, how productive farmland can be, and what management practices are needed for long-term success. For landowners, tenants, and agricultural investors, understanding soil characteristics is essential when evaluating farmland and making crop production decisions.
Nebraska’s soils vary significantly from east to west, shaped by thousands of years of wind deposition, glacial activity, erosion, and climate patterns. This diversity creates distinct agricultural regions, each with unique strengths and limitations. Matching crop selection to these soil conditions is one of the most important factors in maximizing both productivity and profitability.
Much of Nebraska’s most productive farmland is found in the eastern and central portions of the state, where loam and silty soils dominate. These soils are often considered ideal for row crop production because they offer a balanced mix of sand, silt, and clay. This balance provides strong water-holding capacity while still allowing for good drainage and root development.
One of the best-known examples is the Holdrege silt loam, which was designated Nebraska’s official state soil due to its agricultural importance. Found across large portions of south-central Nebraska, Holdrege silt loam is deep, fertile, and naturally well-drained. It supports excellent yields of corn, soybeans, alfalfa, and other crops when managed with appropriate nutrient applications and moisture control. With irrigation or consistent rainfall, these soils can be among the highest-producing in the state.
Corn and soybeans dominate much of this region because these crops thrive in soils with moderate to high organic matter and consistent moisture retention. Wheat and forage crops also perform well, particularly in areas with slightly lower rainfall or where crop rotation is used to improve soil health.
As you move westward, Nebraska’s soils become increasingly sandy and less forgiving. The Nebraska Sandhills, one of the largest stabilized dune systems in the world, are characterized by sandy and loamy sand soils with low water-holding capacity and lower organic matter content. These soils drain quickly, making them vulnerable to drought stress and less suitable for intensive row crop production without irrigation.
Instead, the Sandhills are ideally suited for native grass production and cattle grazing. Deep-rooted prairie grasses are adapted to these conditions and provide highly productive forage systems. This is why the region has long been central to Nebraska’s cattle industry. In areas where irrigation is available, some row crop production is possible, but careful water management is essential to avoid excessive nutrient leaching through the sandy profile.
In southeastern Nebraska, another set of challenges emerges. Heavy clay soils found in portions of this region have excellent nutrient retention and water-holding capacity, but they can create management difficulties. Poor drainage, compaction, and restricted root penetration can limit crop performance if not addressed properly.
These soils often require practices such as tile drainage, reduced tillage, and carefully timed field operations to avoid working wet ground. When managed well, they can support strong corn and soybean yields. However, they demand more attention than the naturally well-balanced silt loams found farther west.
Beyond texture, several additional soil properties influence crop selection. Organic matter content is particularly important because it affects nutrient availability, soil structure, and moisture retention. Higher organic matter generally translates to greater productivity and resilience.
Soil pH is another critical factor. Most Nebraska row crops perform best in slightly acidic to neutral soils. If pH levels fall outside the optimal range, nutrient uptake can be reduced even when fertilizer is present. Soil testing helps identify these issues and guides corrective actions such as lime applications.
To better understand these characteristics, producers and landowners rely heavily on resources from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. The NRCS Web Soil Survey is one of the most valuable tools available, offering detailed maps and interpretations for nearly every parcel of land in Nebraska. These reports provide insights into soil texture, drainage class, erosion risk, crop suitability, and management limitations.
This information is particularly valuable during lease negotiations, land purchases, and long-term planning. Knowing a property’s soil capabilities allows landowners to set realistic expectations and helps tenants choose crop rotations and conservation practices that preserve productivity.
Ultimately, successful farming in Nebraska depends on working with the land rather than against it. By understanding soil characteristics and matching crop selection accordingly, landowners and producers can maximize yields, improve efficiency, and protect long-term soil health for future generations.
Ready to take the next step?
AgWest Land Brokers can help you in your next step to buy or sell land. To see how we can help call 866-995-8067, send an email, or fill out our convenient web form.
Nebraska’s ranching industry is a vital part of the state’s agricultural economy, and grazing leases are a key tool for connecting landowners with livestock producers. Unlike cropland rents, which tend to follow commodity grain markets, grazing rates are influenced by forage conditions, cattle prices, weather patterns, and local demand. As a result, pasture rental rates and ranch lease terms can vary widely across Nebraska.
Recent data from the University of Nebraska–Lincoln and the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service show clear regional differences in pasture values. In the Nebraska Panhandle and northwest regions, pasture cash rents may average around $16 per acre, reflecting lower rainfall and lighter forage production. In contrast, eastern and southeastern Nebraska—where precipitation is more consistent and grass production is higher—can see pasture rents exceeding $65 per acre. These differences highlight how closely grazing value is tied to land productivity.
Another common way to structure grazing leases is on a per head or per pair basis. Monthly grazing rates for cow-calf pairs in Nebraska often fall in the $60–$80 range, though this can shift depending on forage availability, cattle markets, and seasonal conditions. During strong cattle markets, demand for pasture increases, which can push rates higher. Conversely, drought conditions can reduce available forage and lead to lower stocking rates or shorter grazing seasons, affecting overall lease value.
Because no two pastures are exactly alike, local negotiation is essential. Factors such as soil type, grass species, water availability, fencing quality, and access all influence what a particular property is worth. Stocking rate—the number of animal units a pasture can sustainably support—is one of the most important considerations. Overgrazing can damage long-term productivity, while underutilization may leave value on the table. Establishing an appropriate stocking rate based on local conditions helps protect both the land and the livestock operation.
Lease terms should clearly define the grazing period, which in Nebraska is often around five months, typically from May through October. However, this timeframe can vary depending on weather and forage growth. Including flexibility in the lease can be beneficial, especially in years with unusual conditions. For example, provisions that allow for early removal of cattle during drought or extended grazing during favorable conditions can help both parties adapt.
Responsibility for infrastructure is another critical component of ranch leases. Fences, gates, and water systems—such as tanks, wells, or pipelines—must be maintained to ensure safe and effective grazing. Leases should specify who is responsible for repairs and upkeep, as well as who covers associated costs. Water access is particularly important in pasture agreements, as inadequate or unreliable water sources can limit stocking rates and reduce overall value.
Liability is also an important consideration. Ranch leases should address what happens if livestock are injured, lost, or cause damage to neighboring property. Clear terms can help prevent disputes and ensure that both landowners and tenants understand their responsibilities. In some cases, requiring liability insurance may be a prudent step to protect both parties.
Given Nebraska’s variable climate, drought provisions are increasingly important in grazing leases. Extended dry periods can significantly reduce forage production, forcing ranchers to adjust stocking rates or find alternative feed sources. Including terms that outline how these situations will be handled—such as rent adjustments, early termination options, or shared risk—can help maintain fairness and preserve relationships during challenging conditions.
Weed and brush control is another area that should be addressed in lease agreements. Invasive species can reduce pasture productivity and long-term value if left unmanaged. Determining who is responsible for control measures, whether through mechanical, chemical, or grazing management practices, ensures that the land remains productive over time.
Utility costs, particularly for wells or pumping systems, should also be clearly defined. Energy expenses can fluctuate, and assigning responsibility upfront helps avoid confusion later. In some cases, these costs may be shared or factored into the overall rental rate.
Ultimately, Nebraska grazing rates and ranch leases reflect a balance between land productivity, livestock economics, and local conditions. While survey data provides useful benchmarks, the most successful agreements are tailored to the specific property and operation. By clearly outlining expectations, responsibilities, and contingency plans in a written lease, landowners and ranchers can create arrangements that are fair, flexible, and sustainable for the long term.
Ready to take the next step?
AgWest Land Brokers can help you in your next step to buy or sell land. To see how we can help call 866-995-8067, send an email, or fill out our convenient web form.
Irrigation wells are a cornerstone of Nebraska’s agricultural productivity, supporting millions of acres of cropland across the state. Access to reliable groundwater—especially from sources like the Ogallala Aquifer—has allowed Nebraska producers to maintain consistent yields even in dry years. However, with that opportunity comes a set of legal and regulatory responsibilities that both landowners and tenants must understand to remain compliant and protect long-term water availability.
In Nebraska, groundwater is not treated the same as other property rights. Instead of being automatically tied to land ownership, groundwater use is regulated by a combination of state and local authorities. The Nebraska Department of Natural Resources (NeDNR) works alongside locally governed Natural Resources Districts (NRDs) to oversee well permitting, water use, and conservation efforts. This system is designed to balance agricultural productivity with the long-term sustainability of the state’s water resources.
Anyone planning to drill a new irrigation well must typically obtain a permit from their local NRD before construction begins. Each NRD has its own rules regarding well spacing, groundwater allocations, and restrictions on new development, particularly in areas where water supplies are under stress. After a well is drilled, it must also be registered with the state. Registration is not optional—failure to properly register a well can result in it being considered illegal, which may lead to penalties or restrictions on its use.
These regulatory requirements make it essential for landowners and tenants to understand the status of any irrigation wells on a property. This includes verifying that wells are properly permitted, registered, and compliant with current NRD rules. In some areas, additional requirements may apply, such as annual reporting of water use or participation in groundwater management programs. These rules can change over time, so staying informed is an ongoing responsibility.
One of the more complex aspects of irrigation in Nebraska is the distinction between land ownership and water use rights. While a landowner typically owns the physical well and associated equipment, the right to use groundwater is subject to regulation and is not always transferred automatically in the same way as the land itself. This can create confusion, particularly during land sales or lease negotiations.
Because of this, lease agreements should clearly define who holds the right to use the well and who is responsible for its operation. Key considerations include who pays for electricity or fuel to run the pump, who handles routine maintenance, and who is responsible for major repairs or equipment replacement. Irrigation systems can represent a significant investment, and unclear responsibilities can quickly lead to disputes.
Maintenance and upkeep are especially important for preserving both productivity and compliance. Wells must be kept in good working condition to ensure efficient water use and to prevent issues such as leaks or contamination. Pumps, motors, and pivot systems require regular inspection and servicing. In some cases, NRDs may require upgrades or modifications to improve efficiency or reduce water use, adding another layer of responsibility for operators.
Water-use reporting is another critical component. Many NRDs require irrigators to track and report how much water is being pumped, often through flow meters or other monitoring systems. Accurate reporting helps regulators manage groundwater supplies and enforce allocation limits where they exist. For tenants, this means keeping detailed records; for landowners, it means ensuring those requirements are being met on their property.
When farmland changes hands, due diligence around irrigation wells becomes especially important. Buyers should confirm that all wells are properly registered, permitted, and in compliance with current regulations. They should also review any applicable restrictions, such as limits on pumping or moratoriums on new wells. These factors can significantly impact the value and usability of irrigated land.
Ultimately, irrigation wells are both an asset and a responsibility. They provide the water needed to sustain Nebraska’s agricultural success, but they also require careful management and clear communication between landowners and tenants. By outlining responsibilities in written leases, staying current with NRD and state regulations, and maintaining equipment properly, both parties can protect their investment and ensure that this vital resource is used efficiently and sustainably for years to come.
Ready to take the next step?
AgWest Land Brokers can help you in your next step to buy or sell land. To see how we can help call 866-995-8067, send an email, or fill out our convenient web form.
